On June 13 the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged three Charles Schwab investment adviser subsidiaries with misleading Robo-Adviser clients about fees. In order to settle the charges, those three Charles Schwab subsidiaries — Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.; Charles Schwab Investment Advisory, Inc.; and Schwab Wealth Investment Advisory, Inc. — without admitting or denying the charges agreed to pay $187 million to clients that were harmed. 1
Robo-advisers are online services that provide “automated, algorithm-driven financial planning services with little to no human supervision”2 with a typical robo-adviser asking a client questions about their financial situation and future goals through an online survey and then using that data to offer advice and automatically invest for the client.
According to the online Schwab Robo-Advisors introduction “robo-advisers have become popular with novice investors because they have low starting deposits and don’t require in-depth market knowledge” further stating that experienced investors can use robo-advisers to “automate complex time-consuming activities like rebalancing and tax-loss harvesting.”3
The global robo-advisor market has experienced significant growth in the past years and is projected to continue that upward trend in market size. It is projected by market research to reach $2.9 trillion worldwide by 2025, with the 2020 global robo-advisor market reported as $1 trillion.4 While Vanguard has the majority of the robo-advisor market share, Schwab holds second place.5
In the charges brought by the SEC, the agency alleged that from March 2015 through at least November 2018 the Schwab subsidiaries did not disclose to clients that “they were allocating client funds in a manner that their own internal analyses showed would be less profitable for their clients under most market conditions.”6
The SEC claimed that “Schwab made money from the cash allocations in the robo-adviser portfolios by sweeping the cash to its affiliate bank, loaning it out, and then keeping the difference between the interest it earned on the loans and what it paid in interest to the robo-adviser clients.”7
Gurbir S. Grewal, director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement said in the press release about the matter, “Schwab’s conduct was egregious and today’s action sends a clear message to advisers that they need to be transparent with clients about hidden fees and how such fees affect clients’ returns.”8
Our Securities Law Firm located in the Detroit area offers and array of services. In addition to broker securities negligence, our stockbroker lawyers have more than 20 years of experience in securities litigation, broker misconduct, FINRA assistance, tax resolution and more. You can find more information regarding securities fraud and prevention tips at the Federal Bureau Investigation’s website. The Securities and Exchange Commission also offers great information for identifying and avoiding securities malpractice.
If you have questions about your investments or the management of your accounts call and speak with an experienced securities attorney today.
____________________________
1,6,7,8 SEC Press Release: Schwab Subsidiaries Misled Robo-Adviser Clients about Absence of Hidden Fees, 6/13/2022
Link: https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2022-104
2,4 Robo-Advisor by Jake Frankenfield, 2/21/2022
Link: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/roboadvisor-roboadviser.asp
3 Robo-Advisors: An Introduction
Link: https://www.schwab.com/automated-investing/what-is-a-robo-advisor
5 Top Robo Advisors by AUM
Link: https://www.roboadvisorpros.com/robo-advisors-with-most-aum-assets-under-management/